After watching tour two today. I was left with confusion, because I seriously did not really understand what he was trying to explain or what he was saying. It was much harder than tour one and was less interesting for me.Tour two was covering philosophy and ethics. The part where he said something about no basis for ethical standards or ethical language in a world view. I think he meant like there is no need for a universal standard of ethics. I think I agree with this statement, because I don't see the point in the need for a universal standard of things like what is right and what is wrong. I don't think there is a big need of determination. About philosophy I remember him saying that philosophy can not answer the most basic facts about behaviour and morals. However I think that scientific discovery to reality will help our understanding of God's meaning more which can be like biblical morals.... Although I don't really remember the details about the world view. I found the world view vs. Personal world view interesting. It made me notice that even though one thinks what they believe is real, a world view is something much deeper than your personality or how you make things work. I think he tried to say that the world view defines something more about beliefs about reality and how you look at life....If that even makes sense. However honestly, this thing about philosophy and ethics, was really confusing It feels like I was understanding wrong things from what the real message was or what he wanted people to understand. It was hard for me to concentrate listening to the whole video, because I was lost about what he was talking about and what he was trying to explain.
No comments:
Post a Comment